Executive Summary
- Emerging Markets' (EM) earnings are entering their strongest multi-year upswing in a quarter century, driven by improved fundamentals and investor sentiment.
- Geopolitical risks have introduced near-term headwinds via higher energy prices, though the earnings momentum remains intact for now.
- As the fundamental re-rating of EM equities remains on track, investors with a multi-year horizon should find compelling value in the asset class.
For years, EM equities have faced criticism as an asset class. In 2025, however, a clear turning point emerged. MSCI EM equities rose 34%, comfortably outperforming the S&P 500’s 18% gain as EM share prices finally responded to a sharp improvement in fundamentals. Two tailwinds drove this acceleration. First, Artificial Intelligence (AI) related capital spending has lifted EM companies, especially in North Asia, as key suppliers to the global AI supply chain, with many already seeing earnings gains from “picks‑and‑shovels” exposure. Second, a benign commodity backdrop alongside China’s anti involution policies and firmer metals demand supported resource heavy markets such as Brazil and South Africa.
Consensus estimates now point to EM’s earnings per share (EPS) growth of 33% for 2026 and another 15% for 2027, building on solid 16% growth in 2025. See Fig 1. This would represent the strongest sustained earnings expansion in a quarter-century, unmatched except in recovery years following major shocks (e.g., 47% in 2021 post-COVID and 44% in 2010 after the Global Financial Crisis). The concern now is whether the higher energy prices arising from the US-Iran conflict could undermine this earnings momentum.
Fig 1: MSCI EM shows sustained earnings momentum
Source: Eastspring Investments, FactSet, Goldman Sachs, April 2026
Impact of Iran-US conflict
In a scenario of a prolonged conflict, with oil and gas prices remaining higher for longer, we should expect energy costs to feed through to broader inflation, triggering tighter monetary policies, and therefore, softer economic activity. Major energy importers, including India, Thailand, the Philippines, and Chile, face the most direct pressure. The United Arab Emirates and neighbouring countries, given geographic proximity, are also vulnerable to meaningful GDP impact. Net energy importers such as China, Korea, and Taiwan are likely to experience headwinds, though these could be mitigated by supportive fiscal policies and/or continued AI momentum.
Interestingly, while the oil passthrough to inflation in each Emerging Market varies considerably, the region does not appear to be in a worse situation compared to most other Developed Markets (DM). In fact, when looking at the past supply-side oil shocks, MSCI EM Index has performed in line or better than S&P 500 and Stoxx 600 on most occasions. See Fig 2.
Fig 2: Equity markets’ performance during supply-side oil shocks
Source: Bloomberg, UBS. Note: a) The 7 historical episodes are i) Iranian Revolution ii) Gulf War iii) OPEC Supply Constraints iv) Venezuelan Oil Strike v) Outages in Venezuela, Iraq and Nigeria vi) Arab Spring and vii) Russian invasion; b) Time weighted average excludes Iranian Revolution; c) Shanghai Composite Index data not available for Iranian Revolution and Gulf War.
This suggests EM equities continue to be a good candidate for investors seeking diversification away from US equities. Most likely due to significant uncertainty, earnings forecasts remain unchanged for now, though a downward revision is likely in the coming quarters.
Fig 3: Earnings growth across EMs
Source: Eastspring Investments, IBES, J.P. Morgan, March 2026
The long-term case for EM equities remains intact
More than a month into the conflict, the outcome remains uncertain. While it is still too early to quantify the impact on EM, consensus expectations appear to be pricing in a relatively swift resolution, warranting some caution. Nonetheless, taking a longer-term perspective, the structural drivers supporting EM equities are unchanged and, in some cases, strengthened:
- Corporate governance reforms are gaining traction across key markets. This is a gradual process that should not be impacted by geopolitics. Over time, improved capital allocation should help narrow the gap between GDP and EPS growth. The US dollar moves in long cycles and trade-weighted USD appreciation trend in the last 15 years might have ended in 2025. While a knee-jerk reaction to war is usually USD appreciation, the structural factors driving a weaker greenback are not likely to change.
- Capex cycles historically favour EM equities. Increased global tensions might accelerate capex in AI, defense budgets, energy transition, and re-arrangement of supply chains.
- In the past few years, Developed Market companies have benefited from asset-light structures and new business models with powerful network effects. As AI reshapes several industries, potentially disrupting moats, returns might be under pressure.
Fig 4: Returns on equity – MSCI EM relative to SPX Index
Source: Bloomberg, Eastspring Investments as of 20 April 2026
Interesting reads
The information and views expressed herein do not constitute an offer or solicitation to deal in shares of any securities or financial instruments and it is not intended for distribution or use by anyone or entity located in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be unlawful or prohibited. The information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to provide investment advisory or investment management service or the solicitation of an offer to provide investment advisory or investment management services in any jurisdiction in which an offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of that jurisdiction.
Past performance and the predictions, projections, or forecasts on the economy, securities markets or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of Eastspring Investments or any of the strategies managed by Eastspring Investments. An investment is subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. Where an investment is denominated in another currency, exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value price or income of that investment. Furthermore, exposure to a single country market, specific portfolio composition or management techniques may potentially increase volatility.
Any securities mentioned are included for illustration purposes only. It should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell such securities. There is no assurance that any security discussed herein will remain in the portfolio at the time you receive this document or that security sold has not been repurchased.
The information provided herein is believed to be reliable at time of publication and based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation of this report and not as of any future date. Eastspring Investments undertakes no (and disclaims any) obligation to update, modify or amend this document or to otherwise notify you in the event that any matter stated in the materials, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth in the document, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. Eastspring Investments personnel may develop views and opinions that are not stated in the materials or that are contrary to the views and opinions stated in the materials at any time and from time to time as the result of a negative factor that comes to its attention in respect to an investment or for any other reason or for no reason. Eastspring Investments shall not and shall have no duty to notify you of any such views and opinions. This document is solely for information and does not have any regard to the specific investment objectives, financial or tax situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this document.
Eastspring Investments Inc. (Eastspring US) primary activity is to provide certain marketing, sales servicing, and client support in the US on behalf of Eastspring Investment (Singapore) Limited (“Eastspring Singapore”). Eastspring Singapore is an affiliated investment management entity that is domiciled and registered under, among other regulatory bodies, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Eastspring Singapore and Eastspring US are both registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a registered investment adviser. Registration as an adviser does not imply a level of skill or training. Eastspring US seeks to identify and introduce to Eastspring Singapore potential institutional client prospects. Such prospects, once introduced, would contract directly with Eastspring Singapore for any investment management or advisory services. Additional information about Eastspring Singapore and Eastspring US is also is available on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec. gov.
Certain information contained herein constitutes "forward-looking statements", which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "anticipate", "project", "estimate", "intend", "continue" or "believe" or the negatives thereof, other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Such information is based on expectations, estimates and projections (and assumptions underlying such information) and cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of future performance. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results, or the actual performance of any fund may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.
Eastspring Investments companies (excluding JV companies) are ultimately wholly-owned / indirect subsidiaries / associate of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Eastspring Investments companies (including JV’s) and Prudential plc are not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America.