Are low volatility stocks still defensive?

Investors shunned traditional low volatility stocks in favour of stay-at-home stocks post the coronavirus outbreak. This highlights the need to consider other factors when building a low volatility portfolio as well as the advantages of having an investment process that can adapt to a changing market landscape.

The MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility Index is down 7.3% year to date1, underperforming the MSCI AC World Index, which has fallen 1.4%. See Fig. 1. This underperformance appears to go against the tenet of low volatility strategies, which is to protect portfolios during periods of heightened market volatility.

Fig. 1. MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility vs MSCI AC World

Low Volatility chart-01

A closer look, however, reveals a different picture. Between January 17 and March 25 this year, when COVID-19 fears first reverberated through global markets, the MSCI AC World Index corrected 26.2% while the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility Index fell less, by 21.7%. This is the behaviour of low volatility strategies which we have come to expect.

The Minimum Volatility Index’s underperformance to date stems from the market’s fierce rally after it troughed in March. The MSCI AC World has risen 30.4%2 from March 25, fuelled by the rapid and unprecedented scale of monetary and fiscal support from global policy makers. Meanwhile, the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility Index gained 15.9% - still a strong rebound but lacking relative to the broader market index. Given the exceptional drivers behind the market’s correction, investors did not seek “safety” in the traditional defensive, high dividend and low volatility sectors. Instead, they headed for Technology, Healthcare and Ecommerce related stocks which were expected to benefit from social distancing measures and stay at home trends. Fig. 2. shows the different make-up of the two indices and the performance of their top 10 constituents.

Fig. 2.

Low Volatility chart-01

Has the market’s definition of defensiveness changed for good? Do traditional low volatility stocks still have a place in defensive portfolios?

Delivering in past crises

If we examine the market downturns in the last 25 years, we note that the Minimum Volatility Index has delivered what it promises – falling less than the market during periods of heightened volatility – regardless of the cause of the crisis. Fig. 3.

Fig.3. Performance during market drawdowns (1996 – 2020)

Low Volatility chart-01

A low volatility strategy ultimately provides investors with more efficient returns or better risk-adjusted returns, provided they stay the course. (See The low volatility anomaly – Examining the evidence). Fig 4. shows that the Sharpe ratio (which measures return per unit of risk taken) of the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility Index not only beats the market, but also rises significantly as the investment horizon increases.

Fig. 4. Low volatility’s Sharpe ratio improves significantly over time

Low Volatility chart-01

A differentiated approach to low volatility needed

The COVID-19 experience highlights that singularly focusing on the lowest volatility stocks - which typically lie in industries like Utilities and Telecommunications - did not work in a crisis that favoured stay-at-home related names and Healthcare companies at the expense of other industries. In fact, typically high beta areas of the market like Biotech, Internet and Technology handily outperformed the traditionally more defensive areas. It suggests that a single factor approach may not be as effective in achieving the lower drawdowns yet broader equity market participation that many investors desire.

As such, an approach that focuses on identifying the most attractive stocks on a combination of factors, taking into account the efficacy of those factors and the correlations as well as interactions across the factors relative to peers, may be more effective.

By considering companies across the global universe of countries and industries with characteristics such as attractive valuations, higher profitability, better quality, Improving growth outlooks, stronger investor attention, and not just low volatility, our active approach takes advantage of the most attractive pockets of opportunity. This may include exposures to the technology sector or even markets such as China, traditionally viewed as the more volatile segments of the market.   

New challenges, new opportunities

At the point of writing, fears of fresh COVID-19 outbreaks continue to linger. Yet no market crisis is the same, and the genesis of the next one is likely to be different. Quantitative managers like ourselves will continue to find new factors and new ways of defining factors to better capture the market’s changing effects. At the same time, non-traditional data sources, artificial intelligence techniques, and the quantification of more subtle concepts like diversity and inclusion, have brought to light new ways of measuring, grouping and synthesising non-linear pieces of information.

We believe that the quant industry’s continued innovation and creativity in developing new data sets and tools will give rise to new “low volatility” opportunities for investors. Active quantitative managers who are adaptable, and who have extensive research capabilities and experience will continue to remain relevant even as the market landscape evolves.
This is an extract of a longer article “Low volatility strategies – standing their ground”. Please approach an Eastspring sales representative if you would like a copy.  

Disclaimer Strictly Private and Confidential. For Institutional, Wholesale or Professional Investors Only. Not for distribution to the retail public. This document is produced by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited and issued in: Singapore and United States by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H).

This document is solely to be used for informational purposes only and is not intended for anyone other than the recipient. This information is not an offer or solicitation to deal in shares of any securities or financial instruments and it is not intended for distribution or use by anyone or entity located in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be unlawful or prohibited. This document may not be copied, published, circulated, reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of Eastspring Investments.

Information herein is believed to be reliable at time of publication but Eastspring Investments does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and is not responsible for error of facts or opinion nor shall be liable for damages arising out of any person’s reliance upon this information. Any opinion or estimate contained in this document may subject to change without notice.

Past performance and the predictions, projections, or forecasts on the economy, securities markets or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of Eastspring Investments or any of the strategies managed by Eastspring Investments. An investment is subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. Where an investment is denominated in another currency, exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value price or income of that investment. Furthermore, exposure to a single country market, specific portfolio composition or management techniques may potentially increase volatility. The information contained herein does not have any regard to the specific investment objective(s), financial situation or the particular needs of any person.

Where included, benchmark and index data included in this document are provided for illustrative purposes only. The portfolio and/ or services mentioned do not formally track any such benchmarks or indices and no representation is made as to relative future performance or tracking deviation. You should note that investing in financial instruments carries with it the possibility of losses and that a focus on above-market returns exposes the portfolio to above-average risk.

Performance aspirations are not guaranteed and are subject to market conditions. Higher yielding investments can produce income at the expense of capital growth or the capital value of the investment. High volatility investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value, and there could be a large loss on realization which could be equal to the amount invested.

Eastspring Investments (excluding JV companies) are ultimately wholly-owned / indirect subsidiaries of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Eastspring Investments and Prudential plc are not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America. Eastspring Investments Inc. (Eastspring US) primary activity is to provide certain marketing, sales servicing, and client support in the US on behalf of Eastspring Investment (Singapore) Limited (“Eastspring Singapore”). Eastspring Singapore is an affiliated investment management entity that is domiciled and registered under, among other regulatory bodies, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Eastspring Singapore is also registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a registered investment adviser. Eastspring US seeks to identify and introduce to Eastspring Singapore potential institutional client prospects. Such prospects, once introduced, would contract directly with Eastspring Singapore for any investment management or advisory services. In marketing Eastspring Singapore’s services, the Adviser’s employees also may make recommendations about securities that constitute investment advice. Eastspring US does not contract directly with any prospective client, nor does it have any discretion over client assets, nor does it trade, deal or direct trading in any security, client account or fund. Eastspring US does not receive or retain any assets or securities, nor does it serve as a custodian or direct any custodial decisions. Additional information about Eastspring Investments is also is available on the SEC’s website at